<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vision for a Net Positive Energy and Water Campus: Through an Incentive Program for Maximizing Resource Efficiency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.r3think.com/2009/vision-for-a-net-positive-energy-and-water-campus-through-an-incentive-program-for-maximizing-resource-efficiency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.r3think.com/2009/vision-for-a-net-positive-energy-and-water-campus-through-an-incentive-program-for-maximizing-resource-efficiency/</link>
	<description>Rethinking Sustainability, Marketing, Lifestyle, and Other Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:50:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.r3think.com/2009/vision-for-a-net-positive-energy-and-water-campus-through-an-incentive-program-for-maximizing-resource-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 17:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.r3think.com/2009/06/vision-for-a-net-positive-energy-and-water-campus-through-an-incentive-program-for-maximizing-resource-efficiency/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand how this method would spend more resources, and how innovation cannot save energy? Perhaps we have different perceptions on &quot;technology&quot;. I think it&#039;s better to implement &quot;passive&quot; saving features thus making it impossible or very difficult to waste resources at first place. While education is essential, it&#039;s only part of the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand how this method would spend more resources, and how innovation cannot save energy? Perhaps we have different perceptions on &#8220;technology&#8221;. I think it&#8217;s better to implement &#8220;passive&#8221; saving features thus making it impossible or very difficult to waste resources at first place. While education is essential, it&#8217;s only part of the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karenkuo</title>
		<link>http://www.r3think.com/2009/vision-for-a-net-positive-energy-and-water-campus-through-an-incentive-program-for-maximizing-resource-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>karenkuo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.r3think.com/2009/06/vision-for-a-net-positive-energy-and-water-campus-through-an-incentive-program-for-maximizing-resource-efficiency/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>reduce is always better than just relying on &quot;new&quot; technology to &quot;save&quot; more energy that ppl can waste. but implementing this method will certainly spend more &quot;resources&quot; than what they believe to be cost effective. hopefully, ubc can start a new culture and raise a less wasteful generation soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reduce is always better than just relying on &#8220;new&#8221; technology to &#8220;save&#8221; more energy that ppl can waste. but implementing this method will certainly spend more &#8220;resources&#8221; than what they believe to be cost effective. hopefully, ubc can start a new culture and raise a less wasteful generation soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
